Valuing Layer 1 Blockchain Assets: A Deep Dive

The Challenge of Valuing Layer 1 Blockchain Assets

Valuing Layer 1 (L1) blockchain assets like Solana (SOL) and Ethereum (ETH) presents a unique challenge in the world of finance and technology. These new digital assets possess characteristics that don't fit neatly into traditional valuation models, making it difficult for investors and analysts to determine their true worth. In a recent podcast episode, industry experts Dave, Lamar, and the host delved deep into this topic, exploring various frameworks and considerations for valuing L1 assets.

Top Projects

Lulo

Score: 7,586.13

Bonk

Score: 4,806.12

Sphere

Score: 2,544.42

Moonwalk

Score: 2,026.11

The Hybrid Nature of L1 Assets

L1 blockchain assets are not easily classified into existing asset categories. As Lamar points out, "These are hybrid assets... different combinations of startups and economies and commodities." This hybrid nature makes it challenging to apply traditional valuation methods. The experts agree that a combination of different frameworks is necessary to get a comprehensive understanding of an L1 asset's value.

The Speculative Nature of Cryptocurrency Markets

One of the key challenges in valuing L1 assets is the highly speculative nature of the cryptocurrency market. Lamar notes, "The only thing that we can be certain of is that these will never be fairly valued. It'll either be overvalued or undervalued." This volatility and sentiment-driven pricing make it difficult to establish a stable valuation model.

Comparing L1 Assets to Traditional Startups

Lamar draws an interesting parallel between L1 blockchain projects and traditional startups. He explains, "I'm investing a lot of early-stage companies. And I think that for the most part, particularly when you're looking at layer ones and there's dapps and protocols on top of layer ones, but I feel the most comfortable investing in layer ones because they're the horizontal layer." This comparison provides a useful framework for understanding the growth potential and risks associated with L1 assets.

The Importance of Network Effects

Network effects play a crucial role in the value of L1 assets. Dave highlights this point, saying, "The more users that are on the network, the more valuable inherently the network is. It's called Metcalfe's law." This concept is particularly relevant for blockchain networks, where the value of the network increases exponentially as more users join and interact with it.

The Role of Transaction Fees in L1 Economics

Transaction fees are a critical component of L1 economics, but their impact on valuation is not straightforward. While high fees can generate revenue for the protocol, they can also hinder adoption. The experts discuss the differences between Ethereum's high-fee model and Solana's low-fee approach, exploring the pros and cons of each strategy.

Ethereum's Shift to a Settlement Layer

The discussion touches on Ethereum's evolving role in the blockchain ecosystem. Lamar suggests that Ethereum has "doubled and tripled down on this: We are a secure settlement layer." This strategic shift has implications for Ethereum's valuation and its relationship with Layer 2 (L2) solutions built on top of it.

Solana's Focus on Scalability and Low Fees

In contrast to Ethereum, Solana has prioritized scalability and low transaction fees. The experts discuss how this approach could potentially lead to greater adoption and unique use cases. Dave notes, "If Solana remains at sub $0.01 transactions and hopefully, you know, order of magnitude lower than that, I think it's got a real chance to be used by enormous amount of people in the world."

The Importance of Real-World Adoption

The experts emphasize that real-world adoption is crucial for the long-term success and valuation of L1 assets. Lamar suggests that decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN) projects could be a key driver of adoption, saying, "I believe essentially a DePIN decentralized physical infrastructure is going to be the next wave of adoption."

Challenges in Applying Traditional Financial Metrics

The podcast highlights the difficulties in applying traditional financial metrics to L1 assets. Lamar explains, "Unlike Bitcoin, they're more than just store of value. They actually have protocol fees and protocol revenue." However, he also notes that these assets do not trade based on these metrics, making valuation even more complex.

The Role of Liquid Staking Derivatives

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) are discussed as an important factor in the evolving L1 ecosystem. Dave suggests that LSDs could play a crucial role in the future of DeFi on chains like Solana, potentially leading to "a far more flourishing DeFi, especially if Solana does well in the next bull market."

The Impact of Centralization on Network Effects

The experts discuss how centralization tendencies in L2 solutions could potentially impact network effects. Dave raises an interesting point about the potential for L2s to create "monopolistic tendencies" that could hinder interoperability and overall network value.

The Commoditization of Block Space

Lamar introduces an intriguing concept about the future of block space on L1 chains. He suggests, "Inherently, block space becomes commoditized... If you're building into a digital space, block space and the prices of block space will be erased to the bottom." This commoditization could have significant implications for the long-term valuation of L1 assets.

The Security Premium of Established Networks

The discussion touches on the current "security premium" enjoyed by established networks like Ethereum. Lamar suggests that this premium could erode over time as other L1s prove their security and reliability, potentially leading to a shift in value proposition among different chains.

The Role of Stablecoins in L1 Ecosystems

Stablecoins are highlighted as an important factor in the success of L1 ecosystems. The ease of accessing native USDC on Solana is mentioned as a key advantage for projects building on the network, potentially contributing to its overall value proposition.

The Importance of Time and Proven Reliability

The experts emphasize that time and proven reliability are crucial factors in establishing the value of an L1 network. Lamar notes, "I think it's time, it's liquidity and it's reputation and external validation" that will ultimately determine the success and value of L1 assets like Solana.

The Potential for Future Pivots in L1 Strategies

An interesting point raised in the discussion is the potential for L1 projects to pivot their strategies in the future. Lamar draws a parallel to startups, saying, "People take a static view of something as it exists today and extrapolate that as if it's going to remain static. And that is not how startups work." This flexibility could be a key factor in the long-term success of L1 projects.

The Role of Governance in L1 Valuation

While not explicitly discussed in depth, the role of governance in L1 valuation is an important consideration. The ability of token holders to influence the direction of the protocol through governance mechanisms can impact the perceived value of the asset.

The Influence of Regulatory Environment on L1 Valuation

The experts briefly touch on the current regulatory uncertainty surrounding cryptocurrencies in the United States. This regulatory environment adds another layer of complexity to the valuation of L1 assets, as potential classification as securities or commodities could significantly impact their perceived value and use cases.

The Importance of Developer Ecosystems

The strength of a blockchain's developer ecosystem is highlighted as a crucial factor in its value proposition. Chains that can attract and retain talented developers are more likely to see innovative projects and applications built on their network, potentially increasing the overall value of the L1 asset.

The Role of Interoperability in L1 Valuation

While not extensively discussed, the concept of interoperability between different blockchain networks is an important consideration in L1 valuation. The ability of a chain to interact seamlessly with other networks could potentially increase its value proposition and overall adoption.

The Impact of Tokenomics on L1 Valuation

The discussion touches on the importance of tokenomics in determining the value of an L1 asset. Factors such as token distribution, inflation rates, and staking mechanisms all play a role in shaping the economic model of a blockchain network and, consequently, its perceived value.

The Potential for L1 Assets to Become "Money"

An interesting point raised in the discussion is the potential for L1 assets to evolve into forms of "money." While some project leaders, like Anatoly Yakovenko of Solana, have downplayed this possibility, the experts suggest that the emergence of a comprehensive ecosystem around an L1 asset could naturally lead to its use as a form of money.

The Role of MEV in L1 Economics

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) is mentioned as an important factor in L1 economics. The experts discuss how the capture and distribution of MEV can impact the value proposition of different L1 networks, particularly in the context of Ethereum's shift towards a modular architecture with L2 solutions.

The Importance of User Experience in L1 Adoption

While not explicitly discussed at length, the importance of user experience in driving L1 adoption is an underlying theme throughout the conversation. The experts suggest that L1 networks that can provide seamless, user-friendly experiences are more likely to achieve mass adoption and, consequently, higher valuations.

The Role of Institutional Adoption in L1 Valuation

The potential for institutional adoption is briefly touched upon as a factor that could significantly impact L1 valuations. As traditional financial institutions and corporations begin to explore blockchain technology, their choices of which networks to build on or invest in could have substantial effects on the perceived value of different L1 assets.

The Evolving Narrative Around L1 Assets

The experts discuss how the narratives surrounding different L1 assets have evolved over time. From Bitcoin being seen as "ultrasound money" to Ethereum now claiming that title, these shifting narratives play a crucial role in shaping public perception and, consequently, the valuation of these assets.

The Potential for New Valuation Metrics

Throughout the discussion, the experts allude to the potential for new, blockchain-specific valuation metrics to emerge. As the industry matures and more data becomes available, it's likely that analysts and investors will develop novel approaches to valuing these unique digital assets.

The Impact of Global Economic Factors on L1 Valuation

While not extensively discussed, the impact of global economic factors on L1 valuation is an important consideration. Factors such as inflation, geopolitical events, and shifts in monetary policy can all influence the perceived value of blockchain assets as potential hedges or alternative investments.

The Role of Community in L1 Valuation

The strength and engagement of a blockchain's community is highlighted as a crucial factor in its success and valuation. Networks with passionate, active communities are more likely to see sustained development, adoption, and advocacy, all of which can contribute to the overall value of the L1 asset.

In conclusion, the valuation of Layer 1 blockchain assets remains a complex and evolving field. As the industry matures and these networks continue to develop, it's likely that new frameworks and metrics will emerge to better capture their unique value propositions. For now, investors and analysts must consider a wide range of factors, from technical capabilities and economic models to network effects and real-world adoption, when attempting to value these groundbreaking digital assets.

Facts + Figures

• Solana's current transaction rate is about 450 transactions per second, compared to traditional finance's total trades of about 25,000 transactions per second.
• High-frequency trading in traditional finance has a ratio of about 20 to 1 for order placement and cancellation, which would translate to about half a million TPS on a blockchain.
• Solana's lead engineer, Kevin Bowers, suggested that 1 million to 10 million TPS would make blockchain technology truly interesting for financial applications.
• Ethereum's recent meme coin season saw transaction fees spike to $250.
• John Charbonneau's forward-looking model for Ethereum estimates average base fees of about $0.95.
• Solana's transactions remain sub $0.01, with the potential to go even lower.
• Ethereum's staking rate is currently around 16%, significantly lower than other proof-of-stake chains.
• Solana's staking ratio is about 60%, similar to Cardano and Avalanche.
• Tron, Polkadot, and Polygon have staking ratios around 40%.
• Ethereum's liquid staking token LIDO accounts for about a third of all staked ETH.
• Solana's market cap per transaction is around $200, compared to Visa or Mastercard's $600 to $900 per transaction.
• Solana's current market cap is approximately $8 billion, compared to Ethereum's $220 billion.

Questions Answered

What makes Layer 1 blockchain assets difficult to value?

Layer 1 blockchain assets are difficult to value because they are hybrid assets that combine characteristics of startups, economies, and commodities. Traditional valuation models don't fully capture their unique properties, such as network effects, protocol revenue, and potential for mass adoption. The speculative nature of the cryptocurrency market also adds to the complexity, making it challenging to establish a stable valuation framework.

How does Solana's approach to scalability differ from Ethereum's?

Solana focuses on achieving high scalability and low transaction fees directly on its base layer, aiming to support a large number of transactions per second at minimal cost. In contrast, Ethereum has shifted towards becoming a secure settlement layer, relying on Layer 2 solutions for scalability. This fundamental difference in approach affects how each network accrues value and positions itself for future growth and adoption.

What role do transaction fees play in the economics of Layer 1 blockchains?

Transaction fees play a crucial role in Layer 1 blockchain economics, but their impact on valuation is complex. High fees can generate revenue for the protocol and its stakeholders, as seen with Ethereum. However, they can also hinder adoption by making the network expensive to use. Solana's approach of keeping fees very low aims to encourage widespread usage and adoption, potentially leading to value accrual through network effects rather than direct fee revenue.

How might the concept of "block space commoditization" affect Layer 1 valuations in the future?

The concept of block space commoditization suggests that as more Layer 1 blockchains prove their security and reliability, the premium currently enjoyed by established networks like Ethereum may erode. This could lead to increased competition based on efficiency and cost, potentially driving down the value of block space across all networks. As a result, Layer 1 valuations may become more dependent on factors such as unique features, ecosystem strength, and real-world adoption rather than solely on the ability to charge high fees for transactions.

What is the significance of liquid staking derivatives for Layer 1 ecosystems?

Liquid staking derivatives (LSDs) are important for Layer 1 ecosystems because they allow users to stake their tokens while maintaining liquidity. This can lead to higher staking participation rates and more capital available for DeFi applications. For networks like Solana, increased adoption of LSDs could potentially lead to a more vibrant DeFi ecosystem, as users can utilize their staked assets in various financial applications. This, in turn, could contribute to the overall value and attractiveness of the Layer 1 network.

How do network effects impact the valuation of Layer 1 blockchain assets?

Network effects significantly impact the valuation of Layer 1 blockchain assets through Metcalfe's law, which states that the value of a network is proportional to the square of the number of connected users. As more users join a blockchain network, its utility and potential applications increase exponentially. This can lead to a virtuous cycle of adoption, development, and value appreciation. However, the experts also discuss how the modular approach of some networks, like Ethereum's Layer 2 ecosystem, might affect these network effects.

What role does real-world adoption play in the valuation of Layer 1 assets?

Real-world adoption is crucial for the long-term success and valuation of Layer 1 assets. The experts emphasize that widespread use of blockchain technology for practical applications, such as decentralized physical infrastructure (DePIN) projects, could drive significant value to these networks. Adoption by mainstream users and integration into everyday activities would validate the technology's utility and potentially lead to sustained demand for the native tokens of successful Layer 1 networks.

How might regulatory developments affect the valuation of Layer 1 blockchain assets?

Regulatory developments can significantly impact the valuation of Layer 1 blockchain assets. The current uncertainty in the United States regarding the classification of cryptocurrencies as securities or commodities adds complexity to valuation models. Future regulatory decisions could affect how these assets are used, traded, and integrated into the broader financial system. Clear, favorable regulations could potentially increase institutional adoption and overall value, while restrictive regulations might hinder growth and adoption.